testing |
1 2 3 |
Testing ATOM API #4 |
|
|
Testing ATOM API #3 |
|
Testing ATOM API #2 |
|
Testing ATOM API |
|
Wooo hoooo!!!! |
|
EA: The Human Story |
|
Globe and Mail: No split for Google
|
Globe and Mail: The best way to buy dividends
|
Techweb.com: Spammer Sentenced to 9 Years In First Felony Conviction
|
NY Times: Hedge Funds' Glitter Fades (but Not for Investors)
|
Hot shot GCC coders at work again... |
So people keep mentioning about how slow GCC has gotten, especially projects that depend on it, like Apple's OS group, and the Linux and BSD people. The GCC devs keep spouting about how they've changed their ways and they are trying to make sure that GCC gets faster. This thread keeps popping up every month or so. So where's the proof? From GCC mailing list: Some numbers on gcc compiling itself:
The total compile time for all 643 .i files: |
The Register.co.uk: Game makers hit with graphics patent violation suit
|
NZ News: Five-a-day cancer benefit shaken
|
Woo hoo!!! I should've bet some money back in April |
The 'incumbent-President-defeats-sitting-senator' indicator worked!!! Better than the "Washington Redskins" or "stock market performance during term of office" indicator. Dang. Should've put some money on this. I am surprised about the number of votes that Bush got. I think Bush's platform targeted a lower level of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs than Kerry's platform. Just my guess. |
NY Times: Japan Issues New Currency to Foil Forgers
|
NY Times: India Taps China's Reserve of Technological Talent
|
test 1 2 3 |